🔗 Share this article

According to several government insiders, Beijing has reportedly threatened to retaliate against the UK if ministers move to designate certain elements of its security apparatus under recently established external lobbying disclosure rules.

Diplomatic Strains Escalate

Beijing representatives reportedly communicated this message to the Foreign Office soon after news surfaced that the UK government was considering such actions. This development has heightened alarm bells given the administration's ongoing reluctance to enforce stricter foreign influence rules on lobbyists representing Beijing or any segment of the PRC government.

Current Foreign Influence Registration Scheme

At present, exclusively Russia and the Islamic Republic have been included in the stricter tier of the external lobbying registry (Firs), which was launched in the summer and was fully implemented this month. This system requires anyone in the UK representing a foreign power or entity to declare their operations to the government or risk legal penalties.

• The enhanced category applies to nations and entities deemed a particular risk.
• It mandates extra reporting beyond the standard requirements.
• As a result, any individual conducting undeclared work on behalf of Tehran or Russia faces up to five years in prison.

Proposed Targets

Earlier this year, reports indicated that rather than designating Beijing as a whole, UK officials were evaluating including specific components of the Chinese political system that have been accused of meddling in western affairs to the enhanced category.

These entities reportedly include:

• China's Ministry of State Security
• The Chinese Communist party (CCP)
• The United Front Work Department
• The People's Liberation Army (PLA)

Collapsed Espionage Case

Simultaneously, the government faces growing scrutiny over the sudden dismissal of an spying trial involving two British citizens, including a former parliamentary researcher. the first defendant, a former legislative assistant to Conservative MPs, and his friend the second defendant had been charged with spying for Beijing.

Their trial was unexpectedly dismissed by the Crown Prosecution Service in the autumn. The accused men had denied the allegations.

Judicial Challenges

Journalistic accounts suggested that the government's unwillingness to officially characterize Beijing as an "enemy" in witness evidence from a security official led to the case's collapse. the national security adviser, the government's national security adviser, allegedly chaired a meeting in Whitehall where he told attendees that the government's evidence would avoid calling the Chinese government an enemy.

Official insiders subsequently rejected the allegation that Powell was involved in limiting government evidence.

The judicial complication originated in the espionage legislation of 1911, which states that a individual is guilty of spying if they transmit information "directly or indirectly useful to an enemy". Yet, the present administration's security policy describes Beijing as a "strategic competitor" rather than an enemy.

Continuing Bilateral Engagement

Despite these disagreements, UK-China diplomatic ties appear to be warming. Multiple senior government figures have visited China on official visits since the new government took office. These include the business secretary, who engaged in trade talks last month, and the national security adviser, who visited during the warmer months.

Furthermore, talks have reportedly taken place between diplomatic corps representatives and parliamentary leadership regarding the prospect of lifting the ban on the PRC diplomat accessing the legislature, potentially in return for Beijing removing its restrictions on UK parliamentarians.

Prime Minister the Labour leader is widely expected to undertake a bilateral trip to China in the beginning of the coming year, though the exact timing might be influenced by global developments, including a possible trip by former US President the Republican figure.