🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.